Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: And then there was rail
Author: Curious
Date: 01-27-2015 - 18:57

Ahh, that answers that question. That seems pretty ridiculous. Is there really more stress (from thermal expansion?) on CWR? Of is the FRA just making sure they have paperwork to keep bureaucrats busy?
And also, is the steel used for CWR different? I always just assumed that you could take any old rail, dump some thermite on it, and voila! (OK ok, I know the process is rather involved, but still.)

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  And then there was rail Howard 01-26-2015 - 18:26
  Re: And then there was rail M. Harris 01-26-2015 - 18:45
  Re: And then there was rail Curious 01-26-2015 - 21:16
  Re: And then there was rail Hank 01-26-2015 - 23:08
  Re: And then there was rail Howard 01-26-2015 - 23:19
  Re: And then there was rail Goober 01-27-2015 - 09:16
  Re: And then there was rail BN Oly 01-27-2015 - 13:10
  Re: And then there was rail Rasputin 01-27-2015 - 14:59
  Re: And then there was rail Curious 01-27-2015 - 18:57
  Re: Jointed to CWR Matt Farnsworth 01-27-2015 - 19:53
  Re: Jointed to CWR cctgm 01-27-2015 - 21:51
  Re: Jointed to CWR JMann 01-28-2015 - 08:41


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **         ********    ******    ******   ******** 
 **    **   **     **  **    **  **    **     **    
 **    **   **     **  **        **           **    
 **    **   ********   **        **           **    
 *********  **         **        **           **    
       **   **         **    **  **    **     **    
       **   **          ******    ******      **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com