OPRRMS Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> This dipute involves the language in the contract
> that was agreed upon by both parties when SMART
> granted NWP use of their property. The contract
> prohibits the storage of hazardous materials,
> which is what NWP is doing at Schellville. The
> Board cited it in their decision, and further
> ruled that NWP had not been "harmed" by SMART's
> actions to deny additional cars.

So, the question then becomes contract interpretation. It's a little difficult to believe NWP would willfully disregard contract instructions IF instructions were clear cut. There is likely more to this than we know.

Someone said awhile back Mansourian and Bosco are like scorpions in a jar.


Jack