 |
Re: SP 4449 South through UP Brooklyn Yard?? >> Thanks Kwcc
Author: FEF-3
Date: 05-10-2017 - 21:50
Erik H. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay then.
>
> I am going to charter some publicly owned
> property. Maybe a police station, or a park, or a
> school... Maybe, a WES train.
>
> In doing so, I will demand a "non-disclosure"
> agreement to be signed by the government agency,
> and all details of who I am are to remain
> confidential.
>
> Maybe that will cause disruption because it might
> involve blocking off a street you ordinarily use.
> Or, your bus won't show up, because I took it
> over. Or maybe a fire truck is unavailable to
> respond to a fire at your house, because I have it
> for my own use.
>
> Think that's a crazy analogy?
Not only crazy, but infantile
>
> Who owns the 4449? NOT Doyle McCormack.
Exactly who said he did, and when and where did
they say it?
Who has the City placed in charge of the locomotive?
> So if you're okay with this particular requisition
> of public property, then don't complain when
> someone else does the same thing.
>
> Regardless, the anger expressed by a select few
> appear to indicate the Friends of 4449 are in no
> need of any private financial contributions, and
> based upon the "private business decisions"
> clearly don't seem to indicate behavior of that of
> a non-profit organization, so the Internal Revenue
> Service shall have a little fun.
Go ahead and complain to the IRS. Make my day and
that of a number of more mature people. I'm sure IRS
is eager to hear your crackpot theory of how a non-profit
can or cannot make funds. What sections of the tax
code do you base this on? When they get though laughing
at you, you might want to make sure your own IRS filings
are in order.
You and your buddy can have all the temper tantrums
you want. It won't change a thing, and you will still
look as dumb and as self-centered as you do now.
Little wonder rails in general think foamers are nuts.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay then.
>
> I am going to charter some publicly owned
> property. Maybe a police station, or a park, or a
> school... Maybe, a WES train.
>
> In doing so, I will demand a "non-disclosure"
> agreement to be signed by the government agency,
> and all details of who I am are to remain
> confidential.
>
> Maybe that will cause disruption because it might
> involve blocking off a street you ordinarily use.
> Or, your bus won't show up, because I took it
> over. Or maybe a fire truck is unavailable to
> respond to a fire at your house, because I have it
> for my own use.
>
> Think that's a crazy analogy?
Not only crazy, but infantile
>
> Who owns the 4449? NOT Doyle McCormack.
Exactly who said he did, and when and where did
they say it?
Who has the City placed in charge of the locomotive?
> So if you're okay with this particular requisition
> of public property, then don't complain when
> someone else does the same thing.
>
> Regardless, the anger expressed by a select few
> appear to indicate the Friends of 4449 are in no
> need of any private financial contributions, and
> based upon the "private business decisions"
> clearly don't seem to indicate behavior of that of
> a non-profit organization, so the Internal Revenue
> Service shall have a little fun.
Go ahead and complain to the IRS. Make my day and
that of a number of more mature people. I'm sure IRS
is eager to hear your crackpot theory of how a non-profit
can or cannot make funds. What sections of the tax
code do you base this on? When they get though laughing
at you, you might want to make sure your own IRS filings
are in order.
You and your buddy can have all the temper tantrums
you want. It won't change a thing, and you will still
look as dumb and as self-centered as you do now.
Little wonder rails in general think foamers are nuts.
