Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca
Author: stash
Date: 06-27-2017 - 10:13

Crossing is protected by lights, bells, and gates. Clearly the person was not supposed to be there. Train crew are the victims here. Why was the person on the tracks? If so, it would be trespassing, right?

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca Cal-P 06-26-2017 - 20:45
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca Cal-P 06-26-2017 - 21:37
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca ex-BN 06-27-2017 - 09:24
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca Ed Workman 06-27-2017 - 09:34
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca ex-BN 06-27-2017 - 09:59
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca Graham Buxton 06-27-2017 - 13:16
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca Joe Magruder 06-27-2017 - 09:36
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca stash 06-27-2017 - 10:13
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca BOB R 06-27-2017 - 11:45
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca JustDave 06-27-2017 - 16:25
  Re: AMTK 549 vs trespasser - Richmond, Ca Commuter 06-28-2017 - 08:27


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **      **  ********         **  ******** 
    **     **  **  **  **     **        **  **       
    **     **  **  **  **     **        **  **       
    **     **  **  **  ********         **  ******   
    **     **  **  **  **     **  **    **  **       
    **     **  **  **  **     **  **    **  **       
    **      ***  ***   ********    ******   **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com