Re: Now about this high speed rail thing...
Author: synonymouse
Date: 07-16-2017 - 19:25

The purpose of PBCAHSR is not to make money nor to compete with airlines between LA and SF. It is to provide commute service enabling real estate exploitation, i.e., sprawl.

Earth to Jerry Brown: another LA in the high desert IS Global Warming.

En revanche in France Emmanuel Macron wants to ban all gas and diesel vehicles by 2040 and meantime cut way back on nuclear which currently produces a great part of France's electricity. You really think solar and wind(would you like to have a grinding windmill farm in your backyard?)can generate enough juice to replace fossil?

Live in a cave or get roasted in a skyrise hovel well beyond the reach of any hook and ladder truck? Jetsons' rocket packs required like flotation vests?



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Papandrano 07-14-2017 - 17:05
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail read again 07-14-2017 - 17:15
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Dick Zellerbach 07-14-2017 - 18:00
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 19:28
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 19:30
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 21:07
  Re: BS and more BS in response...... Just Sayin 07-14-2017 - 21:18
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-14-2017 - 19:32
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Peter D. 07-14-2017 - 19:37
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 20:08
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Clem 07-14-2017 - 20:43
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-15-2017 - 10:53
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail . 07-15-2017 - 13:35
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail HUTCH 7.62 07-15-2017 - 18:36
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-15-2017 - 20:20
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail PGE 07-16-2017 - 15:04
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail on the other hand... 07-15-2017 - 20:31
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-16-2017 - 10:30
  Re: The cost of everything and the value of nothing..... BOB2 07-16-2017 - 12:32
  Re: The cost of everything and the value of nothing..... An Observer 07-16-2017 - 12:48
  Re: The cost of everything and the value of nothing..... BOB2 07-16-2017 - 13:40
  Now about this high speed rail thing... Commenter 07-16-2017 - 15:18
  Re: Now about this high speed rail thing... synonymouse 07-16-2017 - 19:25
  Re: Now about this high speed rail thing... Commenter 07-16-2017 - 21:16
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Q 07-17-2017 - 07:30
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Juan Million More 07-17-2017 - 11:52


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please enter the code that you see below in the input field.
 ********   **    **  ********  **     **  ******** 
 **     **  ***   **  **         **   **   **       
 **     **  ****  **  **          ** **    **       
 ********   ** ** **  ******       ***     ******   
 **         **  ****  **          ** **    **       
 **         **   ***  **         **   **   **       
 **         **    **  ********  **     **  ******** 
This message board is maintained by:
Altamont Press Publishing Company