Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail
Author: Juan Million More
Date: 07-17-2017 - 11:52

Q Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Why would space exploration be cheaper than old
> rail tech on earth?
>
>
> That question assumes facts not in evidence.
>
> That $35 billion figure to go to Mars does not
> even include most of the tasks needed to get
> there. But even if it did, it is still just a
> spitball number put out there by the project's
> proponents - no actual evidence presented!
>
> Same thing with the high speed rail - except that
> the $68 billion number has already long been
> proven to be Bullsh!t. Even so, anybody with any
> brains already knew it from the getgo anyway - no
> evidence there either!
>
> It's not that Cal- Rail couldn't have been built
> for that, or even for less; but that given all
> the BS politics in California, it never would get
> built at all - at any price; also that what few
> fragments did get built, would be useless segments
> from no-where to He!!-N-gone.
>
>
> Oh well - it's only money. And it does grow on
> trees - just ask any California politician!
> Too bad the tree species Californicus Monetarus
> has been put of the endangered species list
> because of over harvesting.



Well just bring in more "trees" from places like Mexico or China.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Papandrano 07-14-2017 - 17:05
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail read again 07-14-2017 - 17:15
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Dick Zellerbach 07-14-2017 - 18:00
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 19:28
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 19:30
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 21:07
  Re: BS and more BS in response...... Just Sayin 07-14-2017 - 21:18
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-14-2017 - 19:32
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Peter D. 07-14-2017 - 19:37
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail synonymouse 07-14-2017 - 20:08
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Clem 07-14-2017 - 20:43
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-15-2017 - 10:53
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail . 07-15-2017 - 13:35
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail HUTCH 7.62 07-15-2017 - 18:36
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-15-2017 - 20:20
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail PGE 07-16-2017 - 15:04
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail on the other hand... 07-15-2017 - 20:31
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail An Observer 07-16-2017 - 10:30
  Re: The cost of everything and the value of nothing..... BOB2 07-16-2017 - 12:32
  Re: The cost of everything and the value of nothing..... An Observer 07-16-2017 - 12:48
  Re: The cost of everything and the value of nothing..... BOB2 07-16-2017 - 13:40
  Now about this high speed rail thing... Commenter 07-16-2017 - 15:18
  Re: Now about this high speed rail thing... synonymouse 07-16-2017 - 19:25
  Re: Now about this high speed rail thing... Commenter 07-16-2017 - 21:16
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Q 07-17-2017 - 07:30
  Re: $35 billion Mars vs. $68 billion California rail Juan Million More 07-17-2017 - 11:52


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please enter the code that you see below in the input field.
 **     **  ********   **     **  ********   **       
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **  ********   **     **  ********   **       
 **     **  **         **     **  **         **       
 **     **  **         **     **  **         **       
  *******   **          *******   **         ******** 
This message board is maintained by:
Altamont Press Publishing Company