Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Feinstein-DeSaulnier take on MTC-BART-SPUR
Author: SF Bob
Date: 12-08-2017 - 15:08

The best of both worlds is to have a southern crossing for the road, and a second Bart tunnel next to it.

BTW the Richmond bridge needs to be replaced also. To few of lanes. Have SMART run on that bridge, with a line down the center for the FWY to the Richmond station

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Feinstein-DeSaulnier take on MTC-BART-SPUR synonymouse 12-08-2017 - 11:02
  Re: Feinstein-DeSaulnier take on MTC-BART-SPUR espee2472 12-08-2017 - 13:40
  Re: Feinstein-DeSaulnier take on MTC-BART-SPUR SF Bob 12-08-2017 - 15:08
  Re: Feinstein-DeSaulnier take on MTC-BART-SPUR synonymouse 12-08-2017 - 18:57
  Re: MTC-BART-SPUR - R & SR Bridge Nudge 12-09-2017 - 07:53
  BART- Sanctuary Trains HUTCH 7.62 12-12-2017 - 08:16


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **        **  **     **  **         *******  
 **     **        **  ***   ***  **        **     ** 
 **     **        **  **** ****  **        **        
 **     **        **  ** *** **  **        ********  
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **        **     ** 
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **        **     ** 
  *******    ******   **     **  ********   *******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com