Re: 4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland?
Author: Logical Foamer
Date: 12-22-2017 - 20:22

synonymouse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.cnbc.com]
> ampus.html
>
> Cleveland desperately needs the jobs and will
> provide 40,000 parking spaces if need be. Maybe
> Cincy, but forget Columbus, anti-rail.

Do you think about posts before you compose them? Any city providing "40,000 parking spaces" for one company would not need any kind of rail.

A more compelling case for a large company locating in Cleveland, Ohio is that city's location along one of the Great Lakes.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland? synonymouse 12-22-2017 - 20:13
  Re: 4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland? Logical Foamer 12-22-2017 - 20:22
  Re: 4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland? synonymouse 12-22-2017 - 21:49
  Re: 4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland? david vartanoff 12-22-2017 - 23:21
  Re: 4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland? Logical Foamer 12-23-2017 - 13:04
  Re: 4K more to pack Caltrain but why not Cleveland? david vartanoff 12-26-2017 - 13:35
  Ouch Megalamaniacalmouse 12-23-2017 - 10:05


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  ********  **         **    **  **     ** 
 ***   **  **        **    **   **   **    **   **  
 ****  **  **        **    **   **  **      ** **   
 ** ** **  ******    **    **   *****        ***    
 **  ****  **        *********  **  **      ** **   
 **   ***  **              **   **   **    **   **  
 **    **  ********        **   **    **  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com