 |
Re: So are you really a paid schill? You don't actually seem to deny it.....
Author: BOB2
Date: 03-20-2018 - 01:10
"I expected better from you than a knee-jerk “you must be on the payroll” dismissal. How weak.
While I get that you don’t like the current approach for California HSR, what you advocate for is mediocre incrementalism. There is no doubt that with a billion here and a billion there you could make far more immediate progress........"
Actually, I didn't accuse you, did I? What I actually asked you facetiously was: "...are you sure you're not on the payroll of the CHSRA or one of their PR contractors?.....".
And, what I notice from your response, which is a deliberate misquote, and from this "new: line of attack my "mediocre" lack of "vision", is that you don't actually deny being on their payroll .... So that is a very interesting response indeed, very clever.......
As to my boring and "mediocre" program of incrementalism, where we meet peoples real travel needs sometime in their lifetime, with the tax money we've stolen from them, is that somehow worse than spending billions of "our" scarce taxpayer dollars on a bloated, gold plated, political driven contracting racket, to build a rail system that spends 90%+ of all of the funds available for a generation, on a boondoggle that fails to meet any transportation need or deficiency we've actually been able to identify in California?
So, are you a paid schill?
While I get that you don’t like the current approach for California HSR, what you advocate for is mediocre incrementalism. There is no doubt that with a billion here and a billion there you could make far more immediate progress........"
Actually, I didn't accuse you, did I? What I actually asked you facetiously was: "...are you sure you're not on the payroll of the CHSRA or one of their PR contractors?.....".
And, what I notice from your response, which is a deliberate misquote, and from this "new: line of attack my "mediocre" lack of "vision", is that you don't actually deny being on their payroll .... So that is a very interesting response indeed, very clever.......
As to my boring and "mediocre" program of incrementalism, where we meet peoples real travel needs sometime in their lifetime, with the tax money we've stolen from them, is that somehow worse than spending billions of "our" scarce taxpayer dollars on a bloated, gold plated, political driven contracting racket, to build a rail system that spends 90%+ of all of the funds available for a generation, on a boondoggle that fails to meet any transportation need or deficiency we've actually been able to identify in California?
So, are you a paid schill?
