Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER?
Author: American Flyer
Date: 06-18-2018 - 08:24

It appears the only reason CEQA applied was due to the NCRA voluntarily agreeing to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving TCRP funds for rehabilitating and upgrading the line.

This is not the case in Santa Cruz so the RTC is correct when they state they are exempt.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Progressive-RTC-and FOER? UCSC Child 06-17-2018 - 17:50
  Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER? Coastline Bill 06-17-2018 - 18:32
  Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER? reference Santa Cruz Carol L Voss 06-17-2018 - 19:47
  Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER? American Flyer 06-18-2018 - 08:24
  Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER? UCSC Child 06-18-2018 - 09:34
  Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER? Trash Collector 06-18-2018 - 09:46
  Re: Progressive-RTC-and FOER? Rustyspike 06-18-2018 - 23:14


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **  ********   ********  **      ** 
 **   **    **   **   **     **  **    **  **  **  ** 
 **  **      ** **    **     **      **    **  **  ** 
 *****        ***     ********      **     **  **  ** 
 **  **      ** **    **           **      **  **  ** 
 **   **    **   **   **           **      **  **  ** 
 **    **  **     **  **           **       ***  ***  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com