Re: SPUR and SVLG pimp $100bil tax for more 5'6"
Author: Dragoman
Date: 06-11-2019 - 15:17
Stanford Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “poor route to large trip generators such as
> SFO)”
> >
> Is it though? Explain this further, I’m intrigued.
> Was the station supposed to be ‘inline’ On a
> peninsula route instead of a stub end?
How 'bout the exorbitant surcharge charged on trips to SFO? (Same on the OAK connector, for that matter.)