Bring Back the Oil Cans?
Author: FUD
Date: 06-24-2019 - 17:58

A company called Crimson Pipeline is working with Shell to acquire its oil pipeline through the San Joaquin Valley. The line is one of three that move oil from the Valley to Bay Area refineries. Crimson already owns one of the others - so the purchase (in addition to safety issues discussed in this KQED article) would give Crimson effective control over pipeline capacity and pricing in the area.

In addition to refineries griping at the PUC about the deal, independent oil producers are worried about Crimson raising prices or simply shutting down one of the pipelines reducing capacity. Oil producers are worried that they might have to truck oil to the refineries if the pipeline becomes unavailable - raising prices.

So ... what about resurrecting the Oil Cans, but this time running from Bakersfield to Martinez and Benicia? They'd have to be heated or insulated, since most California Central Valley crude needs to be hot to flow (it's basically light asphalt).



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Bring Back the Oil Cans? FUD 06-24-2019 - 17:58
  Re: Bring Back the Oil Cans? Cprr 06-25-2019 - 13:16
  "Tank Train" or conventional tank cars? some guy 06-25-2019 - 18:46


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   *******   **     **  **     **  **     ** 
    **     **     **  ***   ***   **   **   **     ** 
    **     **     **  **** ****    ** **    **     ** 
    **      ********  ** *** **     ***     ********* 
    **            **  **     **    ** **    **     ** 
    **     **     **  **     **   **   **   **     ** 
    **      *******   **     **  **     **  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com