Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off?
Author: D.B. Cooper
Date: 11-14-2019 - 11:13

This question requires some deep thought.

3985 was a hard-charging, hard working fast and noisy locomotive that never failed to do whatever it was assigned to do. It looked, sounded, and ran as the machine was meant to. And the cherry on the sundae: it was brought back to life by volunteer active and retired UP employees at negligible cost to UP. Probably cost UP less than $30k
to restore, if even that much.

4014 is delicate, slow, quiet, failed on it's break-in trip, is still not complete, is squeaky-clean and unable to move without assistance. It was brought back to life by current employees and contractors at enormous cost in man-hours and overtime. Some figures say as much as $12 million or more.

IMO,



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Was the 4014 a good trade off? Hail the 4014 11-10-2019 - 22:48
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? UNP 104 11-11-2019 - 00:32
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Hail the 4014 11-11-2019 - 15:42
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? YES ron 11-11-2019 - 07:37
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? E 11-11-2019 - 07:42
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? trackwalker 11-11-2019 - 08:18
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? G. Poindexter 11-11-2019 - 08:30
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Special Ed 11-11-2019 - 08:46
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? . 11-11-2019 - 10:00
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Mike Stimpson 11-11-2019 - 09:43
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? In the know 11-11-2019 - 10:03
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? E 11-11-2019 - 12:59
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? G. Poindexter 11-11-2019 - 18:17
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Spying from the dumpster 11-11-2019 - 22:05
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Big Boy 11-12-2019 - 21:59
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Hail the 4014 11-11-2019 - 15:58
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? COED 11-11-2019 - 16:15
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Trevithick 11-11-2019 - 18:07
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Mike Stimpson 11-12-2019 - 09:42
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Bozito 11-12-2019 - 21:58
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Mike Stimpson 11-13-2019 - 09:25
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Hot Water 11-13-2019 - 10:26
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Mike Stimpson 11-13-2019 - 12:51
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Bozito 11-13-2019 - 15:10
  Yes, people want to see the biggest ever built Si 11-11-2019 - 13:10
  Re: Yes, people want to see the biggest ever built Just Courious 11-11-2019 - 18:00
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Lake Austin RR 11-11-2019 - 14:46
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? The Dear Leader 11-11-2019 - 18:28
  Re: I loved the show and circus gevos_forever 11-11-2019 - 19:31
  Re: I loved the show and circus BN Oly 11-11-2019 - 21:59
  Re: I loved the show and circus Nipsey 11-12-2019 - 05:27
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? It's the man, not the machine. 11-12-2019 - 20:17
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Negin 11-12-2019 - 23:10
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? Hail the 4014 11-13-2019 - 00:09
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? It's the man, not the machine. 11-13-2019 - 07:12
  Re: Was the 4014 a good trade off? D.B. Cooper 11-14-2019 - 11:13


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **  ********    *******   **    ** 
 **    **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **   **  
     **    **     **  **     **  **         **  **   
    **     *********  ********   ********   *****    
   **      **     **  **         **     **  **  **   
   **      **     **  **         **     **  **   **  
   **      **     **  **          *******   **    ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com