> So shitting and pissing on the streets of SF despite 200k a pop bathroom being installed, is that efficient? Homeless encampments clogging up the sidewalks, is that more efficient use precious urban street space? Or how about millions of used needles that litter the streets despite shape.

In other words, you're in favor of a free for all, like the utter lawlessness going on in Mexico and Central America?

> Only idiots would continue to tax themselves to throw money at a problem that is clearly not working. As the whole country laughs at Frisco, waiting for the San Andreas fault to let go and the whole city just slip into the sea

And these predatory companies should be able to use the streets and other city services for free? Besides, SF won't "slip into the sea" for at least another 20-50 million years. Besides, it will be taking your domicile with it.