 |
Re: SMART Slammed for Withholding Ridership? Oh BOBBY 2 ....
Author: ron
Date: 12-20-2019 - 10:09
BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, and your point is?
>
> Yeah, where was it on the line, what time was it,
> and how many on-offs, did that train already have,
> at the time this occurred? What exactly does this
> show us in relation to this story about the vast
> SMART conspiracy to "withhold" ridership data, or
> SMART's actual ridership? Nothing....
>
> So your point with that "factoid" is what exactly,
> in relation to these claims of some conspiracy by
> EVIL SMART to withhold its ridership data, that as
> FUD has pointed out, is freely available, for even
> you to see, on-line?
>
> Has this paper making these "allegations" even
> filed an FOIA to uncover the "hidden" ridership
> data? If they haven't then it is very likely that
> this "accusation" is nothing but another third
> rate hack, published by the local "cat box" liner,
> writing an intentional "hit piece", with no
> factual basis behind his purported conspiracy
> theory.
You're kidding? The point is when the average taxpaying citizen reads about a train capable of hauling 168 passengers has 12 people on board they question it's value and if it's something they continue supporting with a tax extension. They don't care about on-offs ,what time ,or where. It only bolsters the point that SMART"S near empty train killed another pedestrian. It also bolsters the point that it would be in SMART"S best interest to defend it's costs versus ridership by withholding ridership data.
Crazy people use terms like "vast conspiracy"and "evil" . Are you mocking them or are you one of them?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, and your point is?
>
> Yeah, where was it on the line, what time was it,
> and how many on-offs, did that train already have,
> at the time this occurred? What exactly does this
> show us in relation to this story about the vast
> SMART conspiracy to "withhold" ridership data, or
> SMART's actual ridership? Nothing....
>
> So your point with that "factoid" is what exactly,
> in relation to these claims of some conspiracy by
> EVIL SMART to withhold its ridership data, that as
> FUD has pointed out, is freely available, for even
> you to see, on-line?
>
> Has this paper making these "allegations" even
> filed an FOIA to uncover the "hidden" ridership
> data? If they haven't then it is very likely that
> this "accusation" is nothing but another third
> rate hack, published by the local "cat box" liner,
> writing an intentional "hit piece", with no
> factual basis behind his purported conspiracy
> theory.
You're kidding? The point is when the average taxpaying citizen reads about a train capable of hauling 168 passengers has 12 people on board they question it's value and if it's something they continue supporting with a tax extension. They don't care about on-offs ,what time ,or where. It only bolsters the point that SMART"S near empty train killed another pedestrian. It also bolsters the point that it would be in SMART"S best interest to defend it's costs versus ridership by withholding ridership data.
Crazy people use terms like "vast conspiracy"and "evil" . Are you mocking them or are you one of them?
