Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Why not more IPFX ?
Author: Steve
Date: 12-22-2019 - 08:41

Here's a photo of a 'NRDX' "Cold Train" reefer:

[www.railcarphotos.com]

The IPFX 74107 reefer I linked above is shown in a 2018 STB listing to become SLC 74107. Further research show he is now RWIX 74107, listed as 'CARB' (California Air Resourses Board) compliant. Most of the ex Amtrak cars are not.

Whether 'IP' nade any money with these is of question to me. Sounds like a few old reefers got to smoke it up till they are likely scrapped in the next few years.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Why not more IA Pac? it was an interesting idea 12-19-2019 - 21:02
  Re: Why not more IA Pac? Berg 12-20-2019 - 17:43
  Re: Why not more IPFX ? Steve 12-20-2019 - 17:53
  Re: Why not more IPFX ? Steve 12-22-2019 - 08:41


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **   *******         **  **     ** 
  **  **   **     **  **     **        **  ***   *** 
   ****    **     **         **        **  **** **** 
    **     **     **   *******         **  ** *** ** 
    **      **   **          **  **    **  **     ** 
    **       ** **    **     **  **    **  **     ** 
    **        ***      *******    ******   **     **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com