Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Why "Big Jacks"?
Author: George Andrews
Date: 12-15-2008 - 19:08

I can understand concerns for the Centennials rigid 4 axle trucks & long wheelbase. I'm assuming there was some lateral movement allowed in the center axles. What was the gross weight per axle of the double diesels ??? Was it much more than 2 GP-40's ???

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Why "Big Jacks"? Mike Stimpson 12-11-2008 - 09:09
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? John Bromley 12-11-2008 - 10:30
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? Caboverbob 12-13-2008 - 19:33
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? - WP 4 axle vs. 6 axle George Andrews 12-14-2008 - 09:01
  Re: WP 4 axle vs. 6 axle SP5103 12-14-2008 - 11:50
  Re: WP 4 axle vs. 6 axle George Andrews 12-14-2008 - 15:34
  Re: Trade-ins for WP's U30Bs OPRRMS 12-16-2008 - 23:11
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? hepkema 12-15-2008 - 12:27
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? George Andrews 12-15-2008 - 19:08
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? J 12-15-2008 - 20:26
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? - Heavy Locomotives George Andrews 12-16-2008 - 16:14
  Re: Why "Big Jacks"? Q 12-19-2008 - 23:01


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **         ********   **     **  **     **   ******  
 **    **   **     **  ***   ***  **     **  **    ** 
 **    **   **     **  **** ****  **     **  **       
 **    **   **     **  ** *** **  *********  **       
 *********  **     **  **     **  **     **  **       
       **   **     **  **     **  **     **  **    ** 
       **   ********   **     **  **     **   ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com