 |
Re: Virgin Kelso Cima Grade
Author: Stupid White Boy
Date: 07-07-2020 - 09:52
BN Oly Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Joe Z Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > NLawson Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The safety of the desert tortoise is FAR more
> > > important than any rail line!
> >
> > You'd really put an additional parallel track
> on
> > an existing line as more important than saving
> a
> > unique (found nowhere else in the world)
> species?
>
> Can someone serisouly explain to me, how widening
> an EXISTING right of way, can cause additional
> harm to a tortise? Its the same BS that UP ran
> into in the Columbia Gorge extending the siding at
> Mosier. It was going to alter fishing treaties?
> Seriously, how? That's like saying you need an
> EIS if you ran a red locomotive vs a yellow one.
> There is no connection. a 25' right of way or a
> 40' right of way isn't going to change how a @#$%&
> tortoise is affected. Adding a right of way,
> sure, but existing? Freaking environmental
> lawyers are the 2nd lowest scum on earth, right
> behind personal injury.
Th Moiser thing was all about access. One can’t access treaty fishing rights when you have a train parked on a siding. The Wasco County Commission who are at least as right wing and stupid as you even figured that one out.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Joe Z Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > NLawson Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The safety of the desert tortoise is FAR more
> > > important than any rail line!
> >
> > You'd really put an additional parallel track
> on
> > an existing line as more important than saving
> a
> > unique (found nowhere else in the world)
> species?
>
> Can someone serisouly explain to me, how widening
> an EXISTING right of way, can cause additional
> harm to a tortise? Its the same BS that UP ran
> into in the Columbia Gorge extending the siding at
> Mosier. It was going to alter fishing treaties?
> Seriously, how? That's like saying you need an
> EIS if you ran a red locomotive vs a yellow one.
> There is no connection. a 25' right of way or a
> 40' right of way isn't going to change how a @#$%&
> tortoise is affected. Adding a right of way,
> sure, but existing? Freaking environmental
> lawyers are the 2nd lowest scum on earth, right
> behind personal injury.
Th Moiser thing was all about access. One can’t access treaty fishing rights when you have a train parked on a siding. The Wasco County Commission who are at least as right wing and stupid as you even figured that one out.
