Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy)
Author: TM
Date: 01-03-2009 - 00:14

Not sure about the paint work. But I do know most of it had to do with the mechanical work done after it's failure on the TUT / NRHS trip.

Don't worry, your not the only one who won't be sad to see TUT go. You only can put up with Skow's "why did you have to bother me" attitude once.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Letter from TUT (not the mummy) OPRRMS 01-02-2009 - 21:47
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) almo 01-02-2009 - 22:13
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) Drew Jacksich 01-02-2009 - 22:50
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) Tom McCann 01-02-2009 - 23:09
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) Drew Jacksich 01-02-2009 - 23:28
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) TM 01-02-2009 - 23:38
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) Drew Jacksich 01-03-2009 - 00:01
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) TM 01-03-2009 - 00:14
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) Mike 01-03-2009 - 21:26
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) Huh! 01-03-2009 - 22:35
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) FRRS1 01-03-2009 - 23:42
  Re: Letter from TUT (not the mummy) KTD 01-04-2009 - 23:14


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  ********         **  **     **  **     ** 
    **     **     **        **  ***   ***   **   **  
    **     **     **        **  **** ****    ** **   
    **     ********         **  ** *** **     ***    
    **     **     **  **    **  **     **    ** **   
    **     **     **  **    **  **     **   **   **  
    **     ********    ******   **     **  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com