 |
Re: Responding to the inane comments
Author: Keith Ode Must be our of Jail
Date: 05-09-2021 - 00:57
theconductor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tarl Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BOB2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >Given the title of your first post, I
> naturally
> > thought it was about your upcoming surgery...
> >
> > I see you're conveniently sidestepping my
> question
> > for a second time. The fact that you
> apparently
> > didn't know that the first post contained rail
> > content speaks volumes about your general
> > observations.
> >
> > theconductor Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >Ah yes, that tiny little liberal corporation
> > known as Amazon.
> >
> > You can remove the words "tiny" and "little" as
> > they are inaccurate.
> >
> > >Parler provided a base and helped plan an
> > insurrection. Maybe their users are just being
> > held accountable? Nah, has to be something
> else.
> >
> > Do you mean that "insurrection" where a guy was
> > walking around dressed like a buffalo? Do you
> > mean that "insurrection" where the security
> guards
> > opened certain doors and invited them in? Do
> you
> > mean that "insurrection" where the New York
> Times
> > was totally fabricating complete B.S. stories
> > (such as a capitol police officer getting
> clubbed
> > with a fire extinguisher) because the
> > "insurrectionists" just weren't misbehaving
> enough
> > to suit their "if it bleeds, it leads"
> narrative?
> >
> > And isn't it interesting that the corrupt FBI
> and
> > DOJ only want to focus on hammering Rudy
> Giuliani
> > and middle-aged women who look like John Denver
> > who participated in the January 6th event, yet
> > they insist on ignoring the contents of Hunter
> > Biden's laptop and everything that Ghislaine
> > Maxwell knows? She'll probably be "committing
> > suicide" any day now. Jack Ruby's son is
> probably
> > in charge of her security.
> >
> >
> [twitter.com]
>
> > 107590021121
> >
> > Amflyer Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So Facebook and Twitter are responsible for
> all
> > the Anti Fa violent acts?
> >
> > Violent acts? Have you not been obediently
> > absorbing what the left-leaning, biased Main
> > Stream Media has been trying to spoon feed
> > you---that they were "peaceful protests"? Come
> > on, man. Be more gullible. In answer to your
> > question, yes, a lot of the "peaceful protests
> /
> > violent acts" are coordinated through Twitter
> > communications. Since Jack Dorsey, being the
> > extreme lib that he is, gives the seal of
> approval
> > to their actions, though, it's no big deal.
> >
> > FUD Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >I may be too simple, but that sounds like the
> > social media people, being private
> organizations,
> > are not prevented from shaping speech on their
> > platforms.
> >
> > They're certainly doing that, by silencing
> > conservative points of view and allowing and
> > promoting liberal and even extremist liberal
> > points of view to remain standing.
> >
> > As stated previously, they need to decide
> whether
> > they're "platforms" or "publishers". They
> can't
> > be both.
>
>
> Not much to say here. Please don't breed.
I think he already did.....
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tarl Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BOB2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >Given the title of your first post, I
> naturally
> > thought it was about your upcoming surgery...
> >
> > I see you're conveniently sidestepping my
> question
> > for a second time. The fact that you
> apparently
> > didn't know that the first post contained rail
> > content speaks volumes about your general
> > observations.
> >
> > theconductor Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >Ah yes, that tiny little liberal corporation
> > known as Amazon.
> >
> > You can remove the words "tiny" and "little" as
> > they are inaccurate.
> >
> > >Parler provided a base and helped plan an
> > insurrection. Maybe their users are just being
> > held accountable? Nah, has to be something
> else.
> >
> > Do you mean that "insurrection" where a guy was
> > walking around dressed like a buffalo? Do you
> > mean that "insurrection" where the security
> guards
> > opened certain doors and invited them in? Do
> you
> > mean that "insurrection" where the New York
> Times
> > was totally fabricating complete B.S. stories
> > (such as a capitol police officer getting
> clubbed
> > with a fire extinguisher) because the
> > "insurrectionists" just weren't misbehaving
> enough
> > to suit their "if it bleeds, it leads"
> narrative?
> >
> > And isn't it interesting that the corrupt FBI
> and
> > DOJ only want to focus on hammering Rudy
> Giuliani
> > and middle-aged women who look like John Denver
> > who participated in the January 6th event, yet
> > they insist on ignoring the contents of Hunter
> > Biden's laptop and everything that Ghislaine
> > Maxwell knows? She'll probably be "committing
> > suicide" any day now. Jack Ruby's son is
> probably
> > in charge of her security.
> >
> >
> [twitter.com]
>
> > 107590021121
> >
> > Amflyer Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > So Facebook and Twitter are responsible for
> all
> > the Anti Fa violent acts?
> >
> > Violent acts? Have you not been obediently
> > absorbing what the left-leaning, biased Main
> > Stream Media has been trying to spoon feed
> > you---that they were "peaceful protests"? Come
> > on, man. Be more gullible. In answer to your
> > question, yes, a lot of the "peaceful protests
> /
> > violent acts" are coordinated through Twitter
> > communications. Since Jack Dorsey, being the
> > extreme lib that he is, gives the seal of
> approval
> > to their actions, though, it's no big deal.
> >
> > FUD Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >I may be too simple, but that sounds like the
> > social media people, being private
> organizations,
> > are not prevented from shaping speech on their
> > platforms.
> >
> > They're certainly doing that, by silencing
> > conservative points of view and allowing and
> > promoting liberal and even extremist liberal
> > points of view to remain standing.
> >
> > As stated previously, they need to decide
> whether
> > they're "platforms" or "publishers". They
> can't
> > be both.
>
>
> Not much to say here. Please don't breed.
I think he already did.....
