 |
Birds of a feather
Author: LES
Date: 07-30-2021 - 09:35
I'll stomach facetiousness or cluelessness on there own but combine the two, sorry, not happening. If you're going to be a smartass at least have some substance with it. You know what they say, birds of a feather.
BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LMAO.... You're down to insulting people with
> that clueless line again? That's too bad... I've
> seen you put out much better sophistry to defend
> this taxpayer funded CAHSRA boondoggle in the
> past. It must be the strain you're under....
>
>
> LES Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I can stomach cluelessness, but cluelessness
> and
> > facetiousness no can do. To include
> > Belen in a HSR discussion is beyond reproach.
> >
> > Currently FRA "HSR" minimum standard: "1. Tier
> I
> > Passenger Train means a short-distance or
> > long-distance intercity passenger train
> providing
> > service at speeds that include those exceeding
> 125
> > mph (201 km/h). These trains may operate on
> shared
> > tracks with freight trains [33]."
> >
> > Lines such as Virgina, Ohio, North Carolina,
> > Arizona and etc are eliminated from HSR fund
> > contention leaving CAHSR and a few privates.
> NEC
> > has there own pot of funds.
> >
> > "Gov. Jared Polis signed off Wednesday on the
> > creation of a new taxing district"
> >
> > "Gov. Jared Polis signed legislation Wednesday
> to
> > create a district for a Front Range passenger
> > rail, a high-speed rail system"
> >
> > "The Front Range train line expansion is
> estimated
> > to cost up to $14 billion to build,"
> >
> > I doubt they'll go for 125 speed capability,
> but
> > you never know.
> >
> > Brighline put in a short 20-30 mile 125mph
> section
> > hoping they would be HSR eligible, maybe
> Colorado
> > will choose the same.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> >
> [ktar.com]
>
> >
> > >
> s-for-passenger-service-between-phoenix-tucson/
BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LMAO.... You're down to insulting people with
> that clueless line again? That's too bad... I've
> seen you put out much better sophistry to defend
> this taxpayer funded CAHSRA boondoggle in the
> past. It must be the strain you're under....
>
>
> LES Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I can stomach cluelessness, but cluelessness
> and
> > facetiousness no can do. To include
> > Belen in a HSR discussion is beyond reproach.
> >
> > Currently FRA "HSR" minimum standard: "1. Tier
> I
> > Passenger Train means a short-distance or
> > long-distance intercity passenger train
> providing
> > service at speeds that include those exceeding
> 125
> > mph (201 km/h). These trains may operate on
> shared
> > tracks with freight trains [33]."
> >
> > Lines such as Virgina, Ohio, North Carolina,
> > Arizona and etc are eliminated from HSR fund
> > contention leaving CAHSR and a few privates.
> NEC
> > has there own pot of funds.
> >
> > "Gov. Jared Polis signed off Wednesday on the
> > creation of a new taxing district"
> >
> > "Gov. Jared Polis signed legislation Wednesday
> to
> > create a district for a Front Range passenger
> > rail, a high-speed rail system"
> >
> > "The Front Range train line expansion is
> estimated
> > to cost up to $14 billion to build,"
> >
> > I doubt they'll go for 125 speed capability,
> but
> > you never know.
> >
> > Brighline put in a short 20-30 mile 125mph
> section
> > hoping they would be HSR eligible, maybe
> Colorado
> > will choose the same.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> >
> [ktar.com]
>
> >
> > >
> s-for-passenger-service-between-phoenix-tucson/
