A few more who didn't read even the executive summary
Author: Commenter
Date: 08-17-2021 - 11:11

Remember, science isn't a destination, it's a voyage.

Science is done by scientists (surprise!). They write papers explaining their work. Those papers are reviewed by anonymous referees and the papers are sent back to the authors for revision. Once everyone agrees, the papers are published in a journal. Then everyone in the field gets to agree or disagree, or come up with new data to prove or disprove the results.

Global warming research has been going on for a very long time, in fact before there was a Republican Party. Here is a summary of the 19th century work:

https://daily.jstor.org/how-19th-century-scientists-predicted-global-warming/

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Now we will see how many commented before they even looked at the link. :)



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Just for all the climate change deniers on AP E.H. Scaryman 08-16-2021 - 12:08
  Re: Just for all the climate change deniers on AP Moron Police 08-16-2021 - 13:43
  Re: Just for all the climate change deniers on AP Your change, sir. 08-16-2021 - 13:45
  Why not just read the actual data? Commenter 08-16-2021 - 14:13
  A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 E.H. Scaryman 08-16-2021 - 14:28
  Re: A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 Moron Police 08-16-2021 - 16:43
  Re: A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 Zoned Ultramafic Intrusion 08-16-2021 - 16:53
  Re: A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 Zoned Ultramafic Intrusion 08-16-2021 - 17:08
  Re: A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 Zoned Ultramafic Intrusion 08-16-2021 - 18:05
  Re: A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 Commenter 08-16-2021 - 19:17
  Re: A French Scientist Figured the Greenhouse Effect Out in 1827 BS Police 08-16-2021 - 19:22
  Re: Just for all the climate change deniers on AP Anon 08-17-2021 - 06:27
  So "Global Warming" didn't work, now you use "climate change". "Climate Change" is a boogeyman argument. as the climate changes everyday, everywhere Kraut 08-17-2021 - 09:14
  A few more who didn't read even the executive summary Commenter 08-17-2021 - 11:11
  Re: A few more who didn't read even the executive summary IPCC Police 08-17-2021 - 11:47
  Re: A few more who didn't read even the executive summary Commenter 08-17-2021 - 13:45
  "Global Warming" [versus or and] "climate change" WebDigger 08-17-2021 - 11:26
  Re: So "Global Warming" didn't work, now you use "climate change". "Climate Change" is a boogeyman argument. as the climate changes everyday, everywhere Anon 08-17-2021 - 12:40


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********        **   *******   ********   ******  
 **              **  **     **  **    **  **    ** 
 **              **         **      **    **       
 ******          **   *******      **     **       
 **        **    **         **    **      **       
 **        **    **  **     **    **      **    ** 
 ********   ******    *******     **       ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com