Re: Trainnews - volume 14 - issue 038 SL&RG
Author: PC
Date: 09-18-2021 - 14:01

There is enough traffic to make the SL&RG viable. It is a difficult RR and has to be run smart - which is hasn't always been. The excursion trains were popular and can also be viable - again, if run smart. The excursion business must enhance - not distract from - the freight operation. The freight business should be aggressively marketed. Granted, they are hindered by UP which is their only connection. A way should be found - or forced - to allow access to BNSF in Walsenburg. Public ownership of the RR may be an option but I don't know if the local counties or the state would want to do (pay) for that.
I see no logical reason for the C&TS to be interested. While railfans may fantasize about running up to Alamosa as in the days of old this makes less than no sense. It will be interesting to see what happens....



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Trainnews - volume 14 - issue 038 Espee99 09-18-2021 - 08:32
  Direct Link to Trainnews - volume 14 - issue 038 Negin 09-18-2021 - 08:44
  DIRECT LINK DIRECT LINK 09-18-2021 - 08:44
  Re: Trainnews - volume 14 - issue 038 RRR 09-18-2021 - 10:14
  Re: Trainnews - volume 14 - issue 038 SL&RG PC 09-18-2021 - 14:01
  Re: Trainnews - volume 14 - issue 038 daily train san antonio-chicago? 09-18-2021 - 12:42


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **  ********   ********   ******** 
 **   **   **     **  **     **  **     **  **       
 **  **    **     **  **     **  **     **  **       
 *****     *********  ********   ********   ******   
 **  **    **     **  **         **         **       
 **   **   **     **  **         **         **       
 **    **  **     **  **         **         ******** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com