I share your concern Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Unfortunately, David decided to let Trigger post after a less than 30 day suspension.

And your proof of this is what?

> It's David's site so he can and will do what he wants,

That we can agree on.

> but if he wants to end this farcical sewer of nonsense he needs to permanently ban Trigger.

Wow. This is quite a revelation. I had no idea that just one individual was solely responsible for all of what you're describing. He or she must have a really bad case of writer's cramp, because, as you say, absolutely no one else has joined in with their two cents. Isn't that correct?

Silly me. I was under the mistaken impression that a whole bunch of other people had jumped on the bandwagon and were, and are, using and abusing the moniker "Trigger", posting all sorts of weird stuff under that name. But you're saying that is not the case. You're saying that there's only one participant in all of this. I just didn't know.

Remember when Jerry Nadler described AntiFa as a "myth" and "Alzheimer's 46" described AntiFa as an "idea"? That's kind of how I categorized this vague and amorphous "Trigger" character.

But you're saying it's all coming from just one person. Why didn't you enlighten all of us with this breakthrough information sooner?