Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit
Author: FUD
Date: 10-28-2022 - 20:24

As a general rule, I agree with you. However, as with all rules, there are exceptions. I know of at least one case where a railbanked r/w was reclaimed for rail use: RJ Corman on a line in PA. So don't say "never" too strongly.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit News item 10-28-2022 - 16:30
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Dr Zarkoff 10-28-2022 - 17:16
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Hoosier 10-28-2022 - 19:29
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Dr Zarkoff 10-28-2022 - 23:04
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Hoosier 10-28-2022 - 23:55
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Larry Shiplett 10-29-2022 - 09:55
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Dan 10-28-2022 - 19:57
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit FUD 10-28-2022 - 20:24
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit BOB2 10-28-2022 - 20:35
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit FUD 10-29-2022 - 13:17
  Re: Another Rails-to-trails lawsuit Really? 10-29-2022 - 13:48
  Wrong, Einstein Sam 10-29-2022 - 06:30


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******   **    **  **          *******   ******** 
 **    **   **  **   **    **   **     **     **    
 **          ****    **    **   **            **    
 **           **     **    **   ********      **    
 **           **     *********  **     **     **    
 **    **     **           **   **     **     **    
  ******      **           **    *******      **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com