Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Funding for historic preservation or rails to trails: BOTH are worthwhile
Author: Capdiamont
Date: 03-20-2010 - 09:09

Lets see here, one org is "rails to trails", which removes rails in favor of trails. Thus both are not saved, and has endless money. The other is historic preservation, which never has enough money. Choice is easy.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Funding for historic preservation OR rails to trails: you decide Richard 03-19-2010 - 11:47
  Re: Funding for historic preservation or rails to trails: BOTH are worthwhile Rails & Trails Dude 03-19-2010 - 21:56
  Re: Funding for historic preservation or rails to trails: BOTH are worthwhile 1stcajon 03-20-2010 - 08:34
  Re: Funding for historic preservation or rails to trails: BOTH are worthwhile Capdiamont 03-20-2010 - 09:09
  Re: Funding for historic preservation or rails to trails: BOTH are worthwhile Richard 03-20-2010 - 13:01


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **  **     **  ********  **        
  **   **   **     **   **   **      **     **    **  
   ** **    **     **    ** **       **     **    **  
    ***     **     **     ***        **     **    **  
   ** **     **   **     ** **       **     ********* 
  **   **     ** **     **   **      **           **  
 **     **     ***     **     **     **           **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com