Re: leased locomotives
Author: sp4294
Date: 10-03-2010 - 10:26

The No. 8 was stored servicable. However, the reason for replacing the 0-6-0's with the 90ton mike was that the trains being hauled out of Yreka at the time were getting too big. The 0-6-0's were geing forced to double the grades over Butcher Hill and out of the Shasta River. Train lengths out of Yreka at this time were frequently in range of 20-25 cars, with a majority of the train being logs from Fruit Growers Supply's reload in Yreka and loaded boxes and flats of lumber from the 7 sawmills the YW was serving in Yreka at that time, and there was usually a couple empties tanks as well. So, judging from the traffic load, and the fact that the 0-6-0's couldn't handle it anymore, I'm sort of find it unlikely that the 25 would be brought in as a replacement, since I don't think it could handle all that tonnage. If the 19 was out of service for a couple days, I can see the No.8 being used, even if the hills had to be doubled. I'll have to go through the stats, for the Ex-State Belt 0-6-0's the YW had and compare them with the 25, but I have a feeling that the 0-6-0's are a bit beefier than the 25, especially since 100% of the weight of the 0-6-0's is on the drivers and the 25 was designed for lightly built logging trackage. And typically when the YW leased locomotives, they usually turned to the SP. They last leased an SP engine being during WWII (another 4-8-0 IIRC) to assist ex-McCloud No.9 until ex-Long-Bell shay No.94 was aquired and was used on a limited basis to assist the No.9 until the State Belt 0-6-0's were aquired in 1945. At which point No.9 was sold to the Amador Central, and the shay sat in Yreka until it was scrapped in 1947 or there abouts.

Tim Stricker
Yreka, CA



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Yreka Western Trivia Question Tom Moungovan 10-01-2010 - 20:46
  Re: Yreka Western Trivia Question Mikado 10-01-2010 - 22:05
  Re: Yreka Western Trivia Question Tom Moungovan 10-02-2010 - 06:39
  Re: Yreka Western Trivia Question Bill K. 10-02-2010 - 07:29
  How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... Jeff Moore 10-02-2010 - 07:59
  Re: How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... Tom Moungovan 10-02-2010 - 08:37
  Re: How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... Mikado 10-02-2010 - 09:47
  Re: leased locomotives Tom Moungovan 10-02-2010 - 12:49
  Re: leased locomotives Bill K. 10-03-2010 - 07:38
  Re: leased locomotives Mikado 10-03-2010 - 09:21
  Re: leased locomotives SP5103 10-03-2010 - 09:36
  Re: leased locomotives sp4294 10-03-2010 - 10:26
  Re: McCloud 25 vs. YW 8 Tom Moungovan 10-03-2010 - 13:28
  Re: McCloud 25 vs. YW 7/8 Tom Moungovan 10-03-2010 - 13:49
  Re: leased SP locomotives in '56 ? Tom Moungovan 10-03-2010 - 13:46
  MR #25 tonnage ratings Jeff Moore 10-03-2010 - 14:39
  Re: leased SP locomotives in '56 ? Mikado 10-03-2010 - 15:44
  Re: leased SP locomotives around '56 ? Tom Moungovan 10-03-2010 - 16:54
  Re: leased SP locomotives around '56 ? SP5103 10-05-2010 - 08:16
  Re: leased SP locomotives around '56 ? Mikado 10-05-2010 - 08:54
  Re: How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... Tony Johnson 10-03-2010 - 19:59
  Re: How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... sp4294 10-03-2010 - 21:18
  Re: How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... Tony Johnson 10-03-2010 - 21:29
  Re: How 'bout those SP 4-8-0's and ten wheelers... sp4294 10-03-2010 - 22:06


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  ********  ********   **        **     ** 
 **     **  **        **     **  **        **     ** 
 **     **  **        **     **  **        **     ** 
 *********  ******    ********   **        ********* 
 **     **  **        **         **        **     ** 
 **     **  **        **         **        **     ** 
 **     **  **        **         ********  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com