Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: ATSF 3751
Author: Jim Fitzgerald
Date: 12-27-2010 - 14:03

Ed, is that an admission that 4449 will be part of the Tacoma NRHS convention?

All of this conjecture on our part about how to get 3751 to the Quad Cities is meaningless. If BNSF said NO, it meant NO.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  ATSF 3751 Ken Shattock (KRK) 12-26-2010 - 20:51
  Re: ATSF 3751 Ken Shattock (KRK) 12-26-2010 - 20:56
  Re: ATSF 3751 Ed Immel 12-27-2010 - 08:41
  Re: ATSF 3751 Shannon 12-27-2010 - 09:01
  Re: ATSF 3751 AZ 12-27-2010 - 09:54
  Re: ATSF 3751 - one problem with that Mike Stimpson 12-27-2010 - 09:59
  Re: ATSF 3751 BNSF Rail Guy 12-27-2010 - 10:01
  Re: ATSF 3751 Mike Stimpson 12-28-2010 - 08:42
  Re: ATSF 3751 Jim Fitzgerald 12-27-2010 - 14:03
  Re: ATSF 3751 DO 12-27-2010 - 11:04
  Re: ATSF 3751 OPRRMS 12-27-2010 - 12:04
  Re: ATSF 3751 E 12-27-2010 - 12:23
  Re: ATSF 3751 George Andrews 12-27-2010 - 14:57


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **  **     **  **      **   ******  
 **     **   **  **   ***   ***  **  **  **  **    ** 
 **     **    ****    **** ****  **  **  **  **       
 **     **     **     ** *** **  **  **  **  **       
 **     **     **     **     **  **  **  **  **       
 **     **     **     **     **  **  **  **  **    ** 
 ********      **     **     **   ***  ***    ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com