Re: BNSF Security Area
Author: Still waiting...
Date: 09-17-2011 - 18:03

My apologies if I inferred that the Dynamic Brake Holding [DBHF] feature was a result of FRA insistance. Whether Chico's Fan Club decided they'd make it a system mechanical upgrade, make it mandatory on W/B freight over Cajon, already filtering into the fleet, or what have you, it was sporadically equipped on power, and the hog did not realize that he could get his dynamics back if he recovered from a penalty or emergency application, as testified.

DBHF is now standard and older power so equipped and has a tag mounted to the control so stating. Very soon after this incident, an accelerated process of implementing this feature was seen.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  BNSF Security Area Observer 09-16-2011 - 16:14
  Re: BNSF Security Area Spooked 09-16-2011 - 16:36
  Re: BNSF Security Area smitty195 09-17-2011 - 06:36
  Re: BNSF Security Area Graham Buxton 09-16-2011 - 17:14
  Re: BNSF Security Area Freericks 09-16-2011 - 21:37
  Re: BNSF Security Area Still waiting... 09-17-2011 - 06:15
  Re: BNSF Security Area trainjunkie 09-17-2011 - 07:23
  Re: BNSF Security Area Still waiting... 09-17-2011 - 18:03
  Re: BNSF Security Area Ob 09-18-2011 - 11:41
  Re: BNSF Security Area Obvious 09-19-2011 - 12:52


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  ********    *******   **    ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **     **  ***   ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **         **  ****  ** 
 **     **  *********  ********    *******   ** ** ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **         **  **  **** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **   *** 
 ********   **     **  ********    *******   **    ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com