Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch
Author: Shortline Sammie
Date: 01-07-2012 - 07:13

Beach Cruiser Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mook Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of the shippers you mentioned, only one is not
> in
> > Watsonville. Now that UP has taken the line
> back,
> > I would expect an embargo or surcharge on work
> > past Watsonville that renders shipments there
> > uneconomic.
>
> Something is going on. UP has yet to send a train
> onto the line. A reefer has sat spotted at
> Americold for a week after being the last move by
> Sierra Northern. At least 2 wood loads destined
> for a branch customer have been rusting to the
> rails at the Junction since the wee hours of last
> Saturday, brought in by the same hauler that
> removed SERA 50 from the scene. The computer has
> them billed for "interchange delivery" to a
> phantom Sierra Northern each day, slipping to the
> next as nothing moves. Monday morning is now the
> next estimated time, but who knows what will
> happen.

Without a car number I can't properly respond but if the trace shows "Interchange Delivered" to the Sierra Northern @ Watsonville, UP's computer still recognizes the Sierra Northern as the operator and the car(s) are likely to sit until someone @ UP pushes the right button on the computer.

Dick Samuels



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Drew Jacksich 01-04-2012 - 23:45
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Shannon 01-05-2012 - 09:09
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch stash 01-05-2012 - 09:19
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 09:34
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Carol L. Voss 01-05-2012 - 10:06
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 10:50
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Bill B 01-05-2012 - 17:56
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch MG42 01-12-2012 - 11:17
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-06-2012 - 20:42
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch DaveB 01-06-2012 - 20:29
  The line is not dead yet Howard 01-05-2012 - 11:13
  Re: The line is not dead yet Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 11:46
  I still enjoy living here Howard 01-05-2012 - 12:04
  Re: The line is not dead yet Steve Carter 01-05-2012 - 12:48
  Re: The line is not dead yet OPRRMS 01-05-2012 - 13:21
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Brian 01-05-2012 - 11:20
  Where is Omahahaha? The Anti-Rail Railfan Howard 01-05-2012 - 11:50
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 12:25
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Tony Johnson 01-05-2012 - 13:26
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch [..CSX..] 01-05-2012 - 13:43
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch BOB R 01-05-2012 - 16:41
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch csx 01-07-2012 - 15:32
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch BOB R 01-07-2012 - 21:37
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch csx 01-08-2012 - 15:55
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT NOT [..CSX..] 01-05-2012 - 17:02
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT Me 01-07-2012 - 15:01
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT NOT [..CSX..] 01-08-2012 - 22:50
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT Drew Jacksich 01-08-2012 - 22:59
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT ...---... 01-09-2012 - 16:16
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT Counterpoint 01-09-2012 - 17:41
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT NOT [..CSX..] 01-10-2012 - 21:15
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Omahahaha 01-05-2012 - 17:01
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-06-2012 - 19:25
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch PT Cruiser 01-07-2012 - 19:48
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Bill B 01-05-2012 - 18:14
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Drew Jacksich 01-05-2012 - 18:52
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Happy Californian 01-05-2012 - 20:52
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Shortline Sammie 01-06-2012 - 08:13
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Howard 01-06-2012 - 09:35
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Rich Hunn 01-06-2012 - 10:16
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch OPRRMS 01-06-2012 - 12:59
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Howard 01-06-2012 - 13:34
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch OPRRMS 01-06-2012 - 19:46
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch George Andrews 01-07-2012 - 09:52
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch OPRRMS 01-07-2012 - 14:37
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Rich Hunn 01-09-2012 - 07:37
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch mook 01-06-2012 - 17:10
  @ Mook Howard 01-06-2012 - 19:06
  Re: @ Mook mook 01-07-2012 - 12:24
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-06-2012 - 19:45
  Isn’t this UP’s normal delivery schedule? Guess Who 01-06-2012 - 19:53
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Shortline Sammie 01-07-2012 - 07:13
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-07-2012 - 14:24
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Railfan & Rails-to-Trails fan 01-06-2012 - 17:49
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Stuck on stUPid 01-08-2012 - 16:56
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch HUTCH 7.62 01-09-2012 - 17:26
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch mook 01-09-2012 - 18:12
  Re: Requiem for the UP crews Severe Duty 01-09-2012 - 19:16
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch HUTCH 7.62 01-10-2012 - 08:20
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch MG42 01-12-2012 - 11:52


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **         *******    ******    *******   **      ** 
 **        **     **  **    **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **        **         **               **  **  **  ** 
 **        ********   **         *******   **  **  ** 
 **        **     **  **               **  **  **  ** 
 **        **     **  **    **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 ********   *******    ******    *******    ***  ***  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com