Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread.
Author: Bruce Kelly
Date: 12-14-2007 - 10:26

Ross, did you come across dollar figures for barge shipping in containers vs. bulk? Reason I ask is the Washington Wheat Commission recently reported that Malaysia, like many other Asian countries, is leaning more toward containerized deliveries of U.S. wheat than bulk deliveries. Bulk cargo Seattle to Malaysia was quoted in excess of $110 per metric ton, while container shipment Seattle to Malaysia was $60 per metric ton. They said "container vessels float higher in the water, thus can travel at a faster rate." The net result sounds weird, like getting Fedex overnight service for cheaper than parcel post. But those are the numbers. Also has to do with the big demand for containers in Asia, and if they can get them there loaded and paying their way, it's better than empty boxes for free. By putting this trans-oceanic thinking into the Snake River, I wonder if there's incentive through cheaper rates and/or less fuel consumption to barge some (but not necessarily all) of Lewiston's goods in containers rather than bulk. This trend is already well under way all over the Inland Northwest. I'm just curious how much more can be done with it.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Ross Hall 12-13-2007 - 17:48
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Dave Smith 12-13-2007 - 19:35
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Ross Hall 12-14-2007 - 17:35
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. George Andrews 12-13-2007 - 19:39
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. S.L. Murray 12-14-2007 - 09:50
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Bruce Kelly 12-14-2007 - 10:26
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Bruce Kelly 12-14-2007 - 13:08
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Ross Hall 12-14-2007 - 17:43
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. There are also other issues. Ross Hall 12-14-2007 - 17:51
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Dave Smith 12-14-2007 - 17:46
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Marc 12-14-2007 - 20:50
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Dave Smith 12-15-2007 - 11:45
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. George Andrews 12-15-2007 - 17:36
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Marc 12-15-2007 - 22:13
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. Dave Smith 12-15-2007 - 23:50
  Re: Rail most efficient, not no 2 continuing earlier thread. hummm... 12-16-2007 - 14:45


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **   *******   **     **  **      ** 
 ***   ***  **     **  **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **** ****  **     **  **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
 ** *** **  **     **   ********  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **     **   **   **          **   **   **   **  **  ** 
 **     **    ** **    **     **    ** **    **  **  ** 
 **     **     ***      *******      ***      ***  ***  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com