Re: Those *were* good watermelons...
Author: Anonymoose
Date: 06-07-2014 - 13:46

Harry Callahan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The white house chefs must be upset.


Why?



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Those *were* good watermelons... Blammo! 06-05-2014 - 20:03
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Chris Walker 06-06-2014 - 02:55
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Harry Callahan 06-06-2014 - 20:30
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Anonymoose 06-07-2014 - 13:46
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... ha ha 06-07-2014 - 20:24
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... HUTCH 7.62 06-08-2014 - 09:47
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Alvah Crocker 06-08-2014 - 13:52
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Viet Vet 06-09-2014 - 11:52
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Alvah Crocker 06-09-2014 - 15:49
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Dr Zarkoff 06-09-2014 - 19:21
  Re: Those *were* good watermelons... Bill Engvall 06-09-2014 - 09:37


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   **     **   *******         **  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **        **  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **        **  **     ** 
  ********  **     **   ********        **  **     ** 
        **   **   **          **  **    **   **   **  
 **     **    ** **    **     **  **    **    ** **   
  *******      ***      *******    ******      ***    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com