 |
Antecendent lessons
Author: Dr. Zarkoff
Date: 03-31-2008 - 02:45
>ZARKOFF hasn't cleared up a thing, the way he made his statement with the comma..
If you had sucessfully passed UCB's Bonehead English course, then you would know that all proper names which are modified by clauses always have a comma between the name and the clause, as in Key Route Ken, renown poster on various discussion groups. That comma following your handle is required. What's missing from my post is the verb.
>Which Miller is REX (RNE) and which Miller is Eastshore Bus//BAERA ??
Please be more explicit if you would!
You spoke of the Warren Miller of RNE. The first part of any sentence always refers to this sort of antecendent and identified him as Warren E. Miller. This is what the "not to be confused with" clause is all about, which clearly defines WK Miller as being part owner of Eastshore Lines, which was originally incorporated to operate the SN streetcar service in Chico when the SN abandonded it.
>Plus, how come you are only responding to this thread after several days ? Hmmmm?
Not that it's really any of your business, but I dont' suscribe, just look in every now and then.
If you had sucessfully passed UCB's Bonehead English course, then you would know that all proper names which are modified by clauses always have a comma between the name and the clause, as in Key Route Ken, renown poster on various discussion groups. That comma following your handle is required. What's missing from my post is the verb.
>Which Miller is REX (RNE) and which Miller is Eastshore Bus//BAERA ??
Please be more explicit if you would!
You spoke of the Warren Miller of RNE. The first part of any sentence always refers to this sort of antecendent and identified him as Warren E. Miller. This is what the "not to be confused with" clause is all about, which clearly defines WK Miller as being part owner of Eastshore Lines, which was originally incorporated to operate the SN streetcar service in Chico when the SN abandonded it.
>Plus, how come you are only responding to this thread after several days ? Hmmmm?
Not that it's really any of your business, but I dont' suscribe, just look in every now and then.
| Subject | Written By | Date/Time (PST) |
|---|---|---|
 Railway Negative Exchange
|
Sunset Express | 03-21-2008 - 13:04 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange
|
WAF | 03-21-2008 - 19:46 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange
|
Henry Miller | 03-21-2008 - 20:14 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange
|
Tom Moungovan | 03-21-2008 - 21:14 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange- MORE INFO
|
Tom Moungovan | 03-22-2008 - 07:23 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
Key Route Ken | 03-22-2008 - 08:26 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
Dr. Zarkoff | 03-26-2008 - 23:37 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
The Old Boomer | 03-27-2008 - 07:21 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
Key Route Ken | 03-27-2008 - 11:09 |
|
Antecendent lessons |
Dr. Zarkoff | 03-31-2008 - 02:45 |
|
Re: Antecendent lessons (Final Info)
|
The Old Boomer | 03-31-2008 - 07:22 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
John Schubert | 06-03-2010 - 10:35 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
Richard E. Bruce | 01-03-2014 - 19:56 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange (Final Info)
|
Cindy Frey | 01-14-2016 - 16:08 |
|
Re: Railway Negative Exchange
|
Derek Whaley | 07-03-2014 - 11:43 |