Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks
Author: Edward
Date: 09-21-2015 - 20:25

The ratio of damage is even greater than you stated. The damage done to a semi-flexible pavement (asphalt) by an axle goes up as the 4.2 power of the weight on that axle. Let's round that down to 4 and use a 4,000 pound car and a 80,000 pound semi. For simplicity let's use short tons. One short ton = 2000 pounds

The car has two axles with 1 ton per axle, or:
2 * (1 * 1 * 1 * 1) = 2 units of damage. The units are left as an exercise for the student.

The semi has five axles. Assume the load is spread evenly. Uneven loading increases the damage. So 40 tons or 8 tons per axle:
5 * (8 * 8 * 8 * 8) = 20,480 units of damage.

The ratio between the car and the semi is 20,480 / 2 = 10,240 to 1

And that is why it costs so much to build and maintain freeways with heavy truck traffic, and why driving in the slow lane of the Nimitz gives one a free massage.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail, less by trucks Bob 09-16-2015 - 16:02
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks BOB2 09-16-2015 - 16:51
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks Bob 09-16-2015 - 17:58
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks George Andrews 09-16-2015 - 19:07
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks mook 09-17-2015 - 13:39
  Re:Yep Mook... Then there are loading and handling costs...? BOB2 09-17-2015 - 16:20
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks The Odd Duck 09-16-2015 - 22:28
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks BN Oly 09-16-2015 - 19:58
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks Nudge 09-16-2015 - 20:39
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks George Andrews 09-16-2015 - 21:02
  Re: Long Beach Port project means more cargo by rail and more by trucks Bob 09-16-2015 - 23:52
  those "evil" "dirty" trucks Ba-Woosh! 09-17-2015 - 08:35
  Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks George Andrews 09-17-2015 - 18:44
  Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks OldPoleBurner 09-21-2015 - 13:10
  Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks George Andrews 09-21-2015 - 18:18
  Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks Edward 09-21-2015 - 20:25
  Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks George Andrews 09-21-2015 - 21:18
  Re: those "evil" "dirty" trucks Edward 09-22-2015 - 09:49


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **          *******   **    **  **    ** 
 **        **    **   **     **   **  **   ***   ** 
 **        **    **   **           ****    ****  ** 
 ******    **    **   ********      **     ** ** ** 
 **        *********  **     **     **     **  **** 
 **              **   **     **     **     **   *** 
 ********        **    *******      **     **    ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com