Pundit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> E, I don't know where you get your information

From the organization and several long-term emebers.

> but
> the situation at WPRM ain't stable.

Far more so than it was a year ago.

> They recently
> got a bundle of cash from a lawsuit settlement (I
> believe)

So what? Would the malcontents have pursued the suit or waved a white flag?

> but there is still no realistic
> fundraising plan to replace this income after they
> blow the wad.

> As to the election, this has been posted before.
>
> Even though the incumbents won the election, the
> Board would be wise to be alarmed at how many
> votes the challengers received. Each side had
> three candidates. The incumbents won with 57% of
> the votes to the challenger's 43% so there seems
> to still be quite a large group of pissed off
> members. (This is not a "significant margin"
> considering the total number of votes cast.)

National elections have been won by much smaller margins.

A 14% difference is substantial.

> The next election should be even more interesting
> since, by then, the bank account will probably be
> under extreme pressure.

You know this for certain?