Re: If ATT-Time Warner why not UP-NS?
Author: I Gotta Basketball Jones
Date: 10-26-2016 - 21:44

That leaves CSX for BNSF - they don't want it. BNSF would rather try merging with CN again than get in bed with CSX.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  If ATT-Time Warner why not UP-NS? synonymouse 10-26-2016 - 20:48
  Re: If ATT-Time Warner why not UP-NS? I Gotta Basketball Jones 10-26-2016 - 21:44
  Re: If ATT-Time Warner why not UP-NS? Donald Point 10-26-2016 - 21:48
  Something much more relevant from US RR history Pdxrailtransit 10-27-2016 - 14:53
  Continued Pdxrailtransit 10-27-2016 - 14:59
  Re: Continued synonymouse 10-27-2016 - 18:45
  Re: Continued Negin 10-28-2016 - 07:59
  Re: Continued synonymouse 10-28-2016 - 10:29


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   ******    *******   ********  ******** 
 ***   ***  **    **  **     **     **     **       
 **** ****  **        **            **     **       
 ** *** **  **        ********      **     ******   
 **     **  **        **     **     **     **       
 **     **  **    **  **     **     **     **       
 **     **   ******    *******      **     **       
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com