>Don't be a snowflake, as AK said do you own research and comento your own conclusions,

Typical conservotard blather. If you make an assertion, it's up to you to accredit it, not us, otherwise you're just blowing smoke up everyone's a**.

> but leave your're bias at home, and be a free thinker.

You set a pellucidly clear and pristine example. The problem is to get those two cells to communicate with each other.

>Lots of info on the interwebs

and disinformation, high popalorum, low popahirum, fake news, and outright deception, all sugar coated (sugar rushes also get people wound up). By all means if you see something which doesn't fit your preconceptions, tar and feather it like you always do. And sorry, the earth isn't flat, and the moon isn't made of green cheese (although the asteroid 16 Psyche is solid metal).

>on the subject of Bloomberg and Soro's.

And what about the Koch brothers? They're innocent babes in the woods??

What's the difference between grass roots organizing and astro-turfing?