Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY
Author: Cprr
Date: 06-15-2017 - 07:28

Oh I agree with the above post about the paving. Nothing worse than a new page job starting and stopping over bad tracks.

What is wrong with the bridge? If it is the main beams underneath, then it would not be hard to replace them. But then we get into who is responsible? The county, or the railroad?

How much income came from running to Santa Paula, I presume with tourist to walk around?



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Trouble ahead for the FWRY Jim 06-13-2017 - 18:02
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY Jim 06-13-2017 - 18:02
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY George Andrews 06-13-2017 - 19:23
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY Cprr 06-13-2017 - 21:14
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY HollySugarSW1 06-14-2017 - 14:55
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY Aunt B 06-14-2017 - 16:56
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY BNSF Rail Guy 06-14-2017 - 20:03
  Re: Trouble ahead for the FWRY Cprr 06-15-2017 - 07:28


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **        **  **     **  **    ** 
 **     **  **     **        **  **     **   **  **  
 **     **  **     **        **  **     **    ****   
 *********  **     **        **  **     **     **    
 **     **   **   **   **    **  **     **     **    
 **     **    ** **    **    **  **     **     **    
 **     **     ***      ******    *******      **    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com