Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: ACE on the NCRY is doubtful
Author: Henry Baum
Date: 02-21-2019 - 23:27

The entire ACEForward project alluded to in this discussion was abandoned over a year ago as non-viable. The PLA was supportive of the efforts made by SJRRA to develop the plan, but we also worked very hard to point out the problems the plan failed to address. By abandoning the project, they did not have to respond to the EIR comments, and the project died.
The current ACEForward project addresses just the expansion to Merced and some other minor improvements to platforms in Alameda County.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  ACE on the NCRY is doubtful J Mann 02-20-2019 - 12:51
  Re: ACE on the NCRY is doubtful I know 02-20-2019 - 13:42
  Re: ACE on the NCRY is doubtful Dexter Day 02-20-2019 - 13:58
  Re: ACE on the NCRY is doubtful Stanford 02-20-2019 - 17:28
  Re: ACE on the NCRY is doubtful Col Jessep 02-20-2019 - 22:25
  Re: Can't Handle The Truth? BOB2 02-21-2019 - 02:14
  Sounds like... Shack 02-21-2019 - 07:32
  Re: ACE on the NCRY is doubtful Henry Baum 02-21-2019 - 23:27


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **  **     **  ********    ******  
 **     **  **   **   **     **  **     **  **    ** 
 **     **  **  **    **     **  **     **  **       
 ********   *****     **     **  ********   **       
 **         **  **    **     **  **         **       
 **         **   **   **     **  **         **    ** 
 **         **    **   *******   **          ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com