Altamont Press Discussion Board :: Discussion

Re: GGRM Move Imminent

Author: E9A

Date: 03-08-2019 - 17:25

BW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> G.Poindexter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BW Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Are the UP steamers all roller bearing axles?
> >
> > So what's your point?
>
> The point is that if UP doesn't allow a move of
> GGRM plain bearing equipment on their track, they
> should be consistently applying the same
> requirement to their own vintage equipment.
>

I don't know how many times it has to be said to make
some people understand it, but UP inspected it and
FRA inspected it, then UP inspected it again and
accepted it for interchange for this move. That MAY
have changed while UP drug their feet hoping GGRM
would just go away.

> I don't consider plain bearings inferior in the
> historic setting. Other than an occasional hot
> box, they worked well for over a hundred years.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Subject	Written By	Date/Time (PST)
GGRM Move Imminent	Question	03-06-2019 - 15:45
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	SBN	03-06-2019 - 16:14
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	I know	03-06-2019 - 16:21
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	I know	03-06-2019 - 16:20
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	BW	03-07-2019 - 17:27
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	Hot Water	03-07-2019 - 17:38
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	G.Poindexter	03-07-2019 - 18:54
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	:p	03-07-2019 - 21:03
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	G.Poindexter	03-08-2019 - 10:16
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	Hot Water	03-08-2019 - 11:36
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	BW	03-08-2019 - 12:35
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	Wot Hater	03-08-2019 - 13:54
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	E9A	03-08-2019 - 17:29
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	E9A	03-08-2019 - 17:25
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	Lima	03-08-2019 - 17:40
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	Hot Water	03-08-2019 - 17:56
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	Negin	03-09-2019 - 01:49
Re: GGRM Move Imminent	!	03-09-2019 - 13:00

Go to: Message List•Search

Subject:
Your Name:

Help information:

BBcode help

Spam prevention:

Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.

 ********  ********  **      **  **     **   ******  
    **     **        **  **  **  **     **  **    ** 
    **     **        **  **  **  **     **  **       
    **     ******    **  **  **  *********  **       
    **     **        **  **  **  **     **  **       
    **     **        **  **  **  **     **  **    ** 
    **     ********   ***  ***   **     **   ******

Enter code:

E9A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BW Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > G.Poindexter Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> > -----
> > > BW Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> > 
> > > -----
> > > > Are the UP steamers all roller bearing
> axles?
> > > 
> > > So what's your point?
> > 
> > The point is that if UP doesn't allow a move of
> > GGRM plain bearing equipment on their track,
> they
> > should be consistently applying the same
> > requirement to their own vintage equipment.
> >
> 
> I don't know how many times it has to be said to
> make
> some people understand it, but UP inspected it
> and
> FRA inspected it, then UP inspected it again and 
> accepted it for interchange for this move.  That
> MAY
> have changed while UP drug their feet hoping GGRM
> 
> would just go away.
> 
> 
>  
> > I don't consider plain bearings inferior in the
> > historic setting.  Other than an occasional hot
> > box, they worked well for over a hundred years.

This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com