Re: Socialism
Author: david vartanoff
Date: 04-23-2019 - 21:25

"complicated"? socialism accurately describes public transit--an enterprise funded from general and dedicated tax revenues providing a service to the general public at user fees low enough to encourage wide usage but nowhere near able to fund the system. TVA--brought electricity to a "third world backwater" (former Confederacy) which the investor owned utilities were uninterested in serving. As to corruption, waste, fraud, etc, think of the vendors who plunder the DOD year in and year out--often buying enough Congress members to get purchases masndated which the Pentagon bosses don't even want (let alone need). And, unlike the bosses at UP, CSX, etc, you get a vote simply by being a citizen without having to buy thousands of $$ worth of shares. No, it isn't complicated.
SMUD works here]; so doLA Water & Power, local electricity distribution by cities like Alameda, Palo Alto, Eugene Oregon and many others. Maybe you prefer PG&E?



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Socialism Old Vet 04-23-2019 - 13:20
  Re: Socialism Leaning Right 04-23-2019 - 13:42
  Re: Socialism side tracked 04-23-2019 - 14:54
  Re: Socialism HUTCH 7.62 04-23-2019 - 14:55
  Re: Socialism Commenter 04-23-2019 - 16:31
  Re: Socialism Rod 04-23-2019 - 17:42
  Re: Socialism MAGA 04-23-2019 - 17:47
  Re: Socialism Leaning Right 04-23-2019 - 18:04
  Re: Socialism Nudge 04-23-2019 - 19:04
  Re: Socialism david vartanoff 04-23-2019 - 22:26
  Re: Socialism david vartanoff 04-23-2019 - 21:25
  Re: Socialism Dr Zarkoff 04-23-2019 - 22:27
  Re: Socialism A Rail Liberal 04-24-2019 - 19:49
  Re: Socialism Socialism and trains. 04-24-2019 - 04:13
  Re: Socialism Alf Doten 04-24-2019 - 08:07
  Re: Socialism Are you a moron? 04-24-2019 - 08:42
  Re: Socialism Feel the Bern 04-24-2019 - 11:14
  Re: Socialism maybe not but not a good neighbor. 04-24-2019 - 17:25
  Re: Socialism Cascade rail fan 04-24-2019 - 17:46
  Red herring arguments just to win an argument Google Search 04-24-2019 - 20:26
  Re: Red herring arguments just to win an argument 25 yr period. 10/yr == > heath hazard 04-25-2019 - 04:06
  Re: Red herring arguments just to win an argument err -- > health; getting lost in the 04-25-2019 - 04:13
  Re: Red herring arguments just to win an argument 1 a year is a red flag but ~ 1 a mont 04-25-2019 - 07:46
  Re: Socialism Timmy 04-24-2019 - 21:19
  Re: Socialism run them tweekers over 04-25-2019 - 04:55
  Re: Socialism why a state shouldn't refuse billions 04-25-2019 - 07:05
  Re: Socialism Who's the moron? 04-24-2019 - 17:36


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **      **  **    **   *******         ** 
 **   **   **  **  **  ***   **  **     **        ** 
 **  **    **  **  **  ****  **  **     **        ** 
 *****     **  **  **  ** ** **   ********        ** 
 **  **    **  **  **  **  ****         **  **    ** 
 **   **   **  **  **  **   ***  **     **  **    ** 
 **    **   ***  ***   **    **   *******    ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com