Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly
Author: muni lover
Date: 11-20-2020 - 15:57

synonymouse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.kqed.org]
> ed-to-redo-portion-of-52-million-twin-peaks-tunnel
> -project
>
> IIRC I don't think this is the first time.

SFMTA needs to be abolished once snd for
all, and muni mansgement needs an enema

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly synonymouse 11-20-2020 - 11:33
  Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly Whoa, an accurate headline 11-20-2020 - 11:39
  Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly .......... 11-20-2020 - 12:31
  Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly muni lover 11-20-2020 - 15:57
  Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly It's only money 11-20-2020 - 16:21
  Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly, yep.... BOB2 11-22-2020 - 09:04
  Re: Re-used ballast in Twin Peaks Tunnel to prove costly, yep.... BOB2 11-22-2020 - 09:08


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **    **   *******   **     **  **     ** 
 **     **   **  **   **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **     **    ****           **  **     **  **     ** 
 **     **     **      *******   **     **  **     ** 
 **     **     **            **   **   **   **     ** 
 **     **     **     **     **    ** **    **     ** 
  *******      **      *******      ***      *******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com