 |
Re: You Can Lead an Idiot to Video Links, But You Can't Make Him View Them
Author: The *REAL* Woke-Ness Monster
Date: 09-04-2021 - 15:35
The Who Gives A Flying @#$%& Monster Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've never clicked on any of the links in any of your rants, Trigger. Wouldn't waste my time.
Yep. Just as predicted and right on schedule. Another effort on your part in getting the last word in. I knew it. I can read you like a book. If only I had this degree of predictability when I'm betting on the horses at Belmont.
News at Noon-ish Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please tell us where you are so we can watch for you in the news during a police standoff or mass-casualty event.
Since you haven't directed this comment at one particular individual, I assume you're directing it at ALL of the participants of this little pissing contest. It takes two (or more) to Tango, and whatever this little game is, it most certainly is not a game of solitaire.
Zoned Ultramafic Intrusion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> His precious youtub videos are desinged to stir people up and get their juices flowing, "yellow press" in electronic form, and never mind a reasoned, factual approach. Like all true beleiving disinformation superspreaders, he just doesn't get it.
"Yellow Press"? A "reasoned, factual approach"? I suppose, in your pea brain, we should get our information from a news outlet like CNN, whose abuses are so egregious that Paul Joseph Watson can make a seven minute, twenty-four second video showcasing just some of them:
[youtu.be]
Would you by any chance know the dollar amount settlement that CNN had to make with Nick Sandmann because they were practicing journalism malpractice? It's a closely guarded secret and inquiring minds would like to know. Yes, before you bring it to my attention, I'm fully aware that the BabylonBee link below is a parody link. Hilarious, wouldn't you say?
[babylonbee.com]
Do you recommend that I get my news and information from the New York Times, who quickly has to retract bullshit stories they publish that attempt to smear conservatives and Trump supporters, but ONLY after they've been caught by journalists like Glenn Greenwald, who still have some integrity and scruples? Did you notice how the Main Stream Media didn't want to cover the story of the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop until well AFTER the November election? Oh my, such a story might have made the Biden father-and-son team look bad, and the MSM wouldn't want any of that information to get out before people cast their ballots. Publishing that story before the election would have torpedoed all of their election meddling efforts.
[greenwald.substack.com]
[greenwald.substack.com]
[www.breitbart.com]
[greenwald.substack.com]
[townhall.com]
Fortunately, the rise of citizen journalists is really taking off. That means that a lot more people other than myself are watching all those YouTube videos that you find so abhorrent. Their viewership numbers are reaching into an area that has a lot of people on The Left genuinely worried, and that's why there are efforts to shut them down. Leftists HATE free speech. Hopefully what's happening in the U.K. won't happen here:
[youtu.be]
Some of these journalists, like Paul Joseph Watson, Mark Dice, Tarl Warwick (Styxhexenhammer666) and Tim Pool are having to switch to platforms like BitChute because YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and a whole bunch of others have a hard-on for conservatives and conservative viewpoints and they think nothing of censoring those views. They even have a special mantra they chant: "[Facebook][Twitter][YouTube] is a private company and it can do what it likes." Funny how they quickly retract that philosophy if the case involves an Oregon baker who doesn't want to serve particular customers on religious grounds. But, as we all know, hypocrisy is the specialty of The Left, liberals and other lunatics such as yourself.
[reason.com]
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've never clicked on any of the links in any of your rants, Trigger. Wouldn't waste my time.
Yep. Just as predicted and right on schedule. Another effort on your part in getting the last word in. I knew it. I can read you like a book. If only I had this degree of predictability when I'm betting on the horses at Belmont.
News at Noon-ish Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please tell us where you are so we can watch for you in the news during a police standoff or mass-casualty event.
Since you haven't directed this comment at one particular individual, I assume you're directing it at ALL of the participants of this little pissing contest. It takes two (or more) to Tango, and whatever this little game is, it most certainly is not a game of solitaire.
Zoned Ultramafic Intrusion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> His precious youtub videos are desinged to stir people up and get their juices flowing, "yellow press" in electronic form, and never mind a reasoned, factual approach. Like all true beleiving disinformation superspreaders, he just doesn't get it.
"Yellow Press"? A "reasoned, factual approach"? I suppose, in your pea brain, we should get our information from a news outlet like CNN, whose abuses are so egregious that Paul Joseph Watson can make a seven minute, twenty-four second video showcasing just some of them:
[youtu.be]
Would you by any chance know the dollar amount settlement that CNN had to make with Nick Sandmann because they were practicing journalism malpractice? It's a closely guarded secret and inquiring minds would like to know. Yes, before you bring it to my attention, I'm fully aware that the BabylonBee link below is a parody link. Hilarious, wouldn't you say?
[babylonbee.com]
Do you recommend that I get my news and information from the New York Times, who quickly has to retract bullshit stories they publish that attempt to smear conservatives and Trump supporters, but ONLY after they've been caught by journalists like Glenn Greenwald, who still have some integrity and scruples? Did you notice how the Main Stream Media didn't want to cover the story of the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop until well AFTER the November election? Oh my, such a story might have made the Biden father-and-son team look bad, and the MSM wouldn't want any of that information to get out before people cast their ballots. Publishing that story before the election would have torpedoed all of their election meddling efforts.
[greenwald.substack.com]
[greenwald.substack.com]
[www.breitbart.com]
[greenwald.substack.com]
[townhall.com]
Fortunately, the rise of citizen journalists is really taking off. That means that a lot more people other than myself are watching all those YouTube videos that you find so abhorrent. Their viewership numbers are reaching into an area that has a lot of people on The Left genuinely worried, and that's why there are efforts to shut them down. Leftists HATE free speech. Hopefully what's happening in the U.K. won't happen here:
[youtu.be]
Some of these journalists, like Paul Joseph Watson, Mark Dice, Tarl Warwick (Styxhexenhammer666) and Tim Pool are having to switch to platforms like BitChute because YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and a whole bunch of others have a hard-on for conservatives and conservative viewpoints and they think nothing of censoring those views. They even have a special mantra they chant: "[Facebook][Twitter][YouTube] is a private company and it can do what it likes." Funny how they quickly retract that philosophy if the case involves an Oregon baker who doesn't want to serve particular customers on religious grounds. But, as we all know, hypocrisy is the specialty of The Left, liberals and other lunatics such as yourself.
[reason.com]
