Re: BNSF labor unrest?
Author: Dr Zarkoff
Date: 01-13-2022 - 11:16

In about 1952, the "rights of RR unions to strike" was rather severely curtailed by the GOP's influencing Congress to pass restrictive amendments to the RLA which very narrowly defined issues and processes on how self-help (strikes and lock-outs) can be implemented, with the excuse being "national security" because of the Korean War. So there won't be a strike unless it's over an issue subject to wildcatting, which means essentially anything which is not covered by the Agreement.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  BNSF labor unrest? ruh roh 01-13-2022 - 10:28
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? ruh roh 01-13-2022 - 10:31
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? Pvt. Obvious 01-13-2022 - 10:44
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? theconductor 01-13-2022 - 12:14
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? Pvt. Obvious 01-13-2022 - 12:30
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? Dr Zarkoff 01-13-2022 - 11:16
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? I dreamed I saw Joe hill today Joe hill 01-13-2022 - 16:06
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? I dreamed I saw Joe hill today Hoghead 1 01-13-2022 - 16:27
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? I dreamed I saw Joe hill today Otis 01-13-2022 - 19:41
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? anonymous 01-13-2022 - 22:07
  Re: BNSF labor unrest? Possible impact on Amtrak ? George Andrews 01-14-2022 - 18:42


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please enter the code that you see below in the input field.
  *******   **     **  ********  **      **  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  **        **  **  **  ***   *** 
        **  **     **  **        **  **  **  **** **** 
  *******   **     **  ******    **  **  **  ** *** ** 
        **  **     **  **        **  **  **  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  **        **  **  **  **     ** 
  *******    *******   ********   ***  ***   **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:
Altamont Press Publishing Company