Albert Einstein Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> < Rudi Toot Toot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >> I have no objections to the words "under God"
> being part of the Pledge of Allegiance.
>
> > Big deal, but you obviously haven't figured out
> yet that none of us value your opinions,
> particularly the ones designed to stir up non-RR
> s**t.
>
> And you speak on behalf of everybody? Was this an
> elected position or did you appoint yourself?
> With all the advance warnings that this was an
> off-topic discussion thread, why did you respond?
> We can probably be guaranteed that you won't
> address the above three questions. You're good at
> that.
>
> >> Do you? If so, why?
>
> >"Congress shall make no law respecting an
> establishment of religion, ". This means all
> religions, including the monotheistic revealed
> religions (known as Jewish, Christian, Moslem, and
> Bahai). Monotheism is inherently intolerant; it
> even says so in the Old Testament.
>
> This country was founded on Christian religious
> principles. The Pilgrims came here to escape
> religious persecution. They weren't atheists or
> Hindus.
>
> >>If someone has no problem with the words "In God
> We Trust" on our money, does that make them a
> McCarthy-esque Right Wing Nut Job?
>
> > You are dumber than a box of rocks. It's the
> McCarthy-ists and the conservotards who actively
> promote this sort of religiosity in the Gubmint.
>
> Just for a change of pace, try answering one of my
> questions with a simple "yes" or "no" answer. If
> you were testifying on a witness stand, you'd be
> cited for contempt of court for insisting on
> making speeches and providing non-responsive
> answers.
>
> ** This is the third time I've posed the question
> of whether or not an objection to the words "In
> God We Trust" makes a person a McCarthy-esque
> Right Wing Nut Job, and you consistently refuse to
> answer the question.**
>
> >> For the life of me I don't know why it's so
> important to you that I make posts using a screen
> name.
>
> > Don't make them in the first place.
>
> Don't make responses on discussion threads where
> ample advance warning is offered indicating that
> the discussion is off-topic and those finding it
> offensive should scroll on by.
>
> >> Tell us your thoughts on the fact that 96% of
> the political campaign contributions from Cornell
> faculty went to Democrats, as was revealed in
> those Fox News links I gave you and that you
> cowardly shied away from.
>
> Faux News? Well well, this explains a lot about
> you because Faux, which is owned by an immigrant
> to the US, subscribes to the principle of a sucker
> like you being born every minute. All Murdoch is
> interested in is *money*.
>
> I can't believe you're this stupid.
>
> The statistic that 96% of the political campaign
> contributions from Cornell faculty goes to
> Democrats was compiled by a journalism student
> there, NOT FOX NEWS, but you're apparently too
> stupid to connect those dots and, if you did, it
> would mean you might have to address that issue
> instead of just taking the easy way out and
> continuously throwing barbs at Fox News. By the
> way, that student was harassed and threatened
> because she had the guts to look into the matter.
> Does any of this register with you or did your
> eyes glaze over as soon as you read "The statistic
> . . . "
>
> ** This is the third time I've had to solicit your
> thoughts on the matter of 96% of political
> campaign contributions from Cornell faculty going
> to Democrats, as you completely skirted around
> that fact in your previous two responses. Can you
> address it this time around?**
>
> >If you can't stand the heat, get out of the
> kitchen.
>
> Don't make responses on discussion threads where
> ample advance warning is offered indicating that
> the discussion is off-topic and those finding it
> offensive should scroll on by.
>
> >> Didn't you read my advance warnings? What
> difference does it make whether or not I'm making
> postings, even if I make 10,000 of them and even
> if they're off-topic?
>
> > Change your handle to "Clueless at the
> Keyboard".
>
> I've got a new one I think you'll like!

[iocdf.org]