Re: Why? Fluidity and conflict reduction, it's all in those number of delays from meets.
Author: BOB2
Date: 10-14-2022 - 19:38

Why? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why?
> Should have spent the funds on more two and/or
> three main tracks!
> How many miles of Single track is still on the
> southern transcon?

2nd question: None.

First question: Tthe numbers in terms of savings from train delay for meets, due to a variety of factors, from ruling grade to maintenance windows, said the cost incurred was a more profitable priority investment now than altenative capital investments like more main tracks at this time and/or this location.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Truxton, Arizona, new fly-over capital expenditures 10-12-2022 - 21:44
  Why? Why? 10-14-2022 - 08:57
  Re: Why? Fluidity and conflict reduction, it's all in those number of delays from meets. BOB2 10-14-2022 - 19:38
  Re: Why? Fluidity and conflict reduction, it's all in those number of delays from meets. Ghost of E.H. Harriman 10-15-2022 - 10:46
  Re: Why? Fluidity and conflict reduction, it's all in those number of delays from meets. Lite Brite 10-16-2022 - 19:30


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   *******   **     **  ********  **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  ***   ***  **    **  **     ** 
 **     **         **  **** ****      **    **     ** 
 **     **   *******   ** *** **     **     **     ** 
 **     **         **  **     **    **       **   **  
 **     **  **     **  **     **    **        ** **   
  *******    *******   **     **    **         ***    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com