 |
Re: When Noted Authors and Celebrities Travel by Rail
Author: CTOMN
Date: 03-13-2023 - 18:26
I'ma M'gaga Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>>> All of your posts are little more than drivel.
>> If that's true, then why do you so consistently respond to them?
> Since you can't figure this out, you are dumber than a box of rocks
Answer: You can't explain why you do it, so you choose to sling insults instead.
> I'm saying that having a degree isn't 100% reliable protection against gullibility.
So tell us, oh wise one. What DOES offer 100% reliable protection against gullibility? This question was initially posed to you in my post made at 13:23 and, of course, you didn't bother to respond. Since you PRETEND to know so much, I await your reply. You're really disappointing me.
> and Naomi Wolf is a conspiracy theorist.
Really now? A liberal and a consultant to Bill Clinton? A conspiracy theorist? Now that is rich. Tell us what she said or did that has convinced you she's a conspiracy theorist. This question was initially posed to you in my post made at 13:23 and, of course, you didn't bother to respond. Since you PRETEND to know so much, I await your reply. You're really disappointing me.
Did you enjoy all the supplemental links I furnished that also reported the same news story as the Epoch Times? They really took the wind out of your sails, didn't they?
> Time for more of your pivotational insecurity links.
I'll leave you with this really good political cartoon:
-------------------------------------------------------
>>> All of your posts are little more than drivel.
>> If that's true, then why do you so consistently respond to them?
> Since you can't figure this out, you are dumber than a box of rocks
Answer: You can't explain why you do it, so you choose to sling insults instead.
> I'm saying that having a degree isn't 100% reliable protection against gullibility.
So tell us, oh wise one. What DOES offer 100% reliable protection against gullibility? This question was initially posed to you in my post made at 13:23 and, of course, you didn't bother to respond. Since you PRETEND to know so much, I await your reply. You're really disappointing me.
> and Naomi Wolf is a conspiracy theorist.
Really now? A liberal and a consultant to Bill Clinton? A conspiracy theorist? Now that is rich. Tell us what she said or did that has convinced you she's a conspiracy theorist. This question was initially posed to you in my post made at 13:23 and, of course, you didn't bother to respond. Since you PRETEND to know so much, I await your reply. You're really disappointing me.
Did you enjoy all the supplemental links I furnished that also reported the same news story as the Epoch Times? They really took the wind out of your sails, didn't they?
> Time for more of your pivotational insecurity links.
I'll leave you with this really good political cartoon:
