Re: V&T derailment
Author: Jim Fitzgerald
Date: 08-09-2010 - 13:49

Wow, No. 29 is deceiving in appearance. The article says it is a 650 ton locomotive, man, heavier than 3985! Reporters.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  V&T derailment Rasputin 08-09-2010 - 07:55
  Re: V&T derailment Jim Fitzgerald 08-09-2010 - 13:49
  Re: V&T derailment Alfred Doten 08-10-2010 - 18:26
  Re: V&T derailment LivingSteam 08-11-2010 - 07:59
  50,000 TONS! LivingSteam 08-11-2010 - 08:32
  Re: 50,000 TONS! Alfred Doten 08-11-2010 - 09:20
  Re: 50,000 TONS! David Maxwell 08-11-2010 - 11:15
  Re: 50,000 TONS! ALCO244 08-11-2010 - 16:43
  Re: 50,000 TONS! Juppo 08-12-2010 - 19:22
  Re: 50,000 TONS! Tom Moungovan 08-13-2010 - 06:57


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   **     **  **    **  **    **  ********  
 **     **  ***   ***   **  **   **   **   **     ** 
 **     **  **** ****    ****    **  **    **     ** 
  ********  ** *** **     **     *****     **     ** 
        **  **     **     **     **  **    **     ** 
 **     **  **     **     **     **   **   **     ** 
  *******   **     **     **     **    **  ********  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com