Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: O.T. Junction, Oregon
Author: Erik H.
Date: 10-06-2015 - 22:29

Why would UP go to the expense of removing a track? Even if they don't use it, the OT proved to be a valuable relief route (remember when the Cascade Line was shut down for months)?

Removing this track doesn't save UP money, doesn't save UP property taxes, but eliminates a ton of flexibility.

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  O.T. Junction, Oregon dcjb 10-06-2015 - 11:12
  Re: O.T. Junction, Oregon George Andrews 10-06-2015 - 20:29
  Re: O.T. Junction, Oregon Erik H. 10-06-2015 - 22:29
  Re: O.T. Junction, Oregon George Andrews 10-07-2015 - 18:29
  Re: O.T. Junction, Oregon Dcjb 10-07-2015 - 21:37
  Re: O.T. Junction, Oregon OT Local 10-08-2015 - 11:57
  Re: O.T. Junction - Out with the old, in with the new, and new X-Over at MP 92 Speeder Kevin 10-11-2015 - 19:35
  Re: O.T. Junction - Out with the old, in with the new, and new X-Over at MP 92 Coalca 10-16-2015 - 22:57


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   ********   **      **  **     **   ******  
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **    ** 
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **       
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **       
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **       
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **    ** 
 ********   ********    ***  ***    *******    ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com