 |
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
Author: The Realist
Date: 02-28-2016 - 13:25
Hopkins Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We are trying to limit coal burning. If that means
> keeping it in the ground, so be it. Screw the
> railroad company. All the railroad nostalgia and
> fanning in the world means nothing if the earth is
> no longer inhabitable because of the release of
> carbon into the atmosphere.
> If you the think global warming isn't real you're
> kidding yourself.
Your basis for believing in this tripe?
Atmospheric CO2 is just over 0.03% of the atmosphere (@385 ppm). This is an increase from being just under 0.03%. The "Final Solution" to this so-called problem is to decrease man's CO2 contribution from the combustion of coal ...... which amounts to no more than 0.003% of that total ...... which will reduce atmospheric CO2 from just over 0.03% to just over 0.03%.
This is why we need a law against stupidity.
-------------------------------------------------------
> We are trying to limit coal burning. If that means
> keeping it in the ground, so be it. Screw the
> railroad company. All the railroad nostalgia and
> fanning in the world means nothing if the earth is
> no longer inhabitable because of the release of
> carbon into the atmosphere.
> If you the think global warming isn't real you're
> kidding yourself.
Your basis for believing in this tripe?
Atmospheric CO2 is just over 0.03% of the atmosphere (@385 ppm). This is an increase from being just under 0.03%. The "Final Solution" to this so-called problem is to decrease man's CO2 contribution from the combustion of coal ...... which amounts to no more than 0.003% of that total ...... which will reduce atmospheric CO2 from just over 0.03% to just over 0.03%.
This is why we need a law against stupidity.
| Subject | Written By | Date/Time (PST) |
|---|---|---|
 Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Pdxrailtransit | 02-24-2016 - 18:12 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Hopkins | 02-24-2016 - 21:00 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
The Realist | 02-28-2016 - 13:26 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Rick Shaw | 02-24-2016 - 21:53 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Colis P | 02-24-2016 - 23:22 |
|
Yeah the USGS is such a political agency.
|
Pdxrailtransit | 02-25-2016 - 16:40 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
up833 | 02-26-2016 - 20:30 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
The Realist | 02-26-2016 - 21:17 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Hopkins | 02-26-2016 - 22:14 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Herman Munster | 02-26-2016 - 22:43 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated. |
The Realist | 02-28-2016 - 13:25 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
Fact Commander | 03-15-2016 - 11:14 |
|
Re: Less Coal in the PRB than estimated.
|
mook | 02-28-2016 - 17:18 |